<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Admit It, You Have No Idea What It Means To Be A UNESCO World Heritage Site, Do You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theexpeditioner.com/2012/01/10/admit-it-you-have-no-idea-what-it-means-to-be-a-unesco-world-heritage-site-do-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theexpeditioner.com/2012/01/10/admit-it-you-have-no-idea-what-it-means-to-be-a-unesco-world-heritage-site-do-you/</link>
	<description>The Expeditioner is a travel magazine for the avid traveler.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: essay help</title>
		<link>http://www.theexpeditioner.com/2012/01/10/admit-it-you-have-no-idea-what-it-means-to-be-a-unesco-world-heritage-site-do-you/#comment-4524</link>
		<dc:creator>essay help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexpeditioner.com/?p=13942#comment-4524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


	
	
	
	
	&lt;!--
		@page { margin: 0.79in }
		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }
	--&gt;
	


I think this is really a very nice
post.


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	<!--<br />
		@page { margin: 0.79in }<br />
		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }<br />
	--></p>
<p>I think this is really a very nice<br />
post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.theexpeditioner.com/2012/01/10/admit-it-you-have-no-idea-what-it-means-to-be-a-unesco-world-heritage-site-do-you/#comment-4523</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexpeditioner.com/?p=13942#comment-4523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, they do act as good indicators as to what to see, despite the politics that are probably involved. It&#039;s kind of like picking out the &quot;Critics Choice&quot; selection from a list of four-star restaurants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, they do act as good indicators as to what to see, despite the politics that are probably involved. It&#8217;s kind of like picking out the &#8220;Critics Choice&#8221; selection from a list of four-star restaurants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.theexpeditioner.com/2012/01/10/admit-it-you-have-no-idea-what-it-means-to-be-a-unesco-world-heritage-site-do-you/#comment-4521</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theexpeditioner.com/?p=13942#comment-4521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wandr.me/World_Heritage_Sites.aspx/user/sethro99&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;55 or so sites I&#039;ve visited thus far&lt;/a&gt; I can actually see why the vast majority made the list. There might be one or two I&#039;m not so sure on, but they nearly all actually represent some sort of significant historical and cultural stature. It makes sense. There could easily be more, I&#039;m sure, but a lot of that comes down to the cash involved and the politics of getting on the list.

That said, there are some sites where I&#039;ve found the surrounding areas more impressive than the actual designated site, but those, too, are not particularly common. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the <a href="http://www.wandr.me/World_Heritage_Sites.aspx/user/sethro99" rel="nofollow">55 or so sites I&#8217;ve visited thus far</a> I can actually see why the vast majority made the list. There might be one or two I&#8217;m not so sure on, but they nearly all actually represent some sort of significant historical and cultural stature. It makes sense. There could easily be more, I&#8217;m sure, but a lot of that comes down to the cash involved and the politics of getting on the list.</p>
<p>That said, there are some sites where I&#8217;ve found the surrounding areas more impressive than the actual designated site, but those, too, are not particularly common. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
